sex education

New RSHE Guidance: Promising first steps, but is this enough?

Getting their homework in just in the nick of time, the Department for Education published updated guidance for schools to help implement the Relationships, Sex and Health Education (RSHE) statutory curriculum during what for many schools, was the last week of the academic year. This guidance has been long awaited. It follows a public consultation period, which took place over a year ago.

Is the new guidance any good?

Some really important steps have been made in acknowledging the need for comprehensive RSHE. It is great to see the inclusion of topics such as reducing stigma around STIs and a greater understanding of important reproductive topics, like fertility and period health. All of these get a specific mention in the new guidance. 

As a charity providing comprehensive and inclusive content from the RSHE curriculum, we’ve long included discussion of HIV PrEP and PEP (prevention medication) in our workshops on sexual and reproductive health. So it’s great to see them also included. We also welcome the specific mention of key issues like tackling online harms and sexual violence, such as coercive control and stalking. The updated guidance also specifically instructs schools to address misogynistic online cultures - citing the incel movement. (Here’s our free guide to tackling the incel movement)

We have long believed naming and challenging these harms is crucial to tackling gender-based and sexual violence. As well as covering these topics in our workshops, we also provide support and advice for schools and parents on these matters. 

So what are the concerns? 

We believe that it is possible to provide high-quality, open and honest education, within the terms of the updated RSHE guidelines. However, we have some serious misgivings about the tone and phrasing used in many parts of the guide. Particularly, we have concerns that such language has the potential to be interpreted in such a way as to harm some young people. 

A major fear is how the guidance frames discussions around LGBTQIA+ identities, particularly with regard to trans people. In fact, it largely avoids mention of the words ‘trans’ or ‘transgender’. This shows a general lack of commitment to affirming and supporting trans youth. 

There are also some transphobic dog whistles used, such as saying that schools ‘should not teach as fact that all people have a gender identity’. We believe that this has the potential to make educators reluctant to discuss gender identity at all, particularly around trans students. 

As a side note, we find a statement which amounts to ‘not all people have a gender identity’ a curious one to put in a government document. We say this as an organisation whose members include academics and educator-practitioners working in areas of gender study. The idea that all people in a society have some idea of what is meant by the term ‘gender’ and also have a sense of where they themselves sit in relation to this, is not a particularly deep or complex notion. To deny that gender identity - and by extension personal and societal concepts of gender - exist, is a curious thing. 

Another troubling statement made in the updated RSHE guidance insists that schools ‘should be mindful to avoid any suggestion that social transition is a simple solution to feelings of distress or discomfort.’ What is the purpose of this instruction? Is it to (incorrectly) imply that some educators were actively persuading students to socially transition in the past? Or is it to suggest that we should now be telling young people that the process of socially transitioning is a difficult one, unlikely to alleviate their feelings of distress or discomfort? As educators, we have a responsibility to give students factual and honest information, not to make value judgements about their lives, experiences or identities. 

There are other areas in the guidance, beyond trans identities, where the language used is problematic. For example, describing those who chose to continue an unplanned pregnancy as ‘keeping the baby’. This language is both factually incorrect (a foetus is not a baby) and also contributes to abortion stigma

Elsewhere in the guidance, schools are told that they must be careful not to ‘stigmatise boys’. The meaning of this is vague. Does this mean we shouldn’t ever imply that there are any negative aspects associated with masculinity? Because analysing and critiquing gender stereotypes and expectations is at the core of understanding sexual and other gender-based forms of violence. The statement also speaks to a reluctance in parts of the guidance to properly name and challenge some aspects of toxic masculinity in a clear and constructive manner.

We share the disappointment with others in the sector that the Department for Education has chosen to keep advice on tailoring RSHE content to students with SEND (special educational needs and disabilities). We know from our d/ Deaf education project that there is a huge appetite for knowledge and best practice around how to effectively deliver RSHE content to SEND students. It is disappointing that the government has chosen not to centre their needs. 

Perhaps in part, the problems of the new RSHE guidance lie with how it came about - through public consultation. We had concerns at the time of the consultation that not enough effort was made to include young people themselves in the process. This seems to show through in how the consultation ignores some of the realities and experiences of young people. 

Additionally, as we have explored above, several dubious views appear to have been incorporated into the new guidance. This seems to take no account for any potential negative impact of these views, or from what position they are held. We strongly believe that RSHE should be informed mainly by the voices, needs and experiences of young people themselves. We feel this should be supported by input from experts, through evidence-led research, practical experience and knowledge - including educators and parents or carers. In that light, it is interesting that the RSHE guidance was opened to public consultation in the first place. What did the Department for Education hope to gain from opening up the process to the general public, which it could not get from intentionally consulting with students, experts and carers specifically?  It was a different government, a different political party and a different Minister for Education who opened up this consultation in 2024. As such, they were not bound by it in the same way. It is curious then, to see what this government appears to have taken from the consultation - namely a lot of bias which does not ensure the dignity and respect of all students in an inclusive way, or consider young people’s voices. 

What now? 

The RSHE guidance will practically come into effect when the new academic year begins in September. We will continue to offer our high-quality workshops, as well as our training to staff delivering these aspects of the curriculum. 

We have a range of resources to support schools and colleges with RSHE provision, available for free. We also have some recommended reading for parents and carers who would like to know more about supporting young people in these areas. 

We would strongly encourage parents and carers to get in touch with their child’s school in the new academic year, particularly if they are concerned they may be negatively impacted on by some interpretations of the updated guidelines. Your voice can be really powerful in advocating how the RSHE curriculum is implemented in schools - something which is enshrined in the new guidance. 

Our hope is that together we can all work to empower young people and ensure they receive the inclusive and comprehensive RSHE that they deserve.

Abortion is healthcare – decriminalisation must be matched by education

We welcome the UK government’s recent decision to decriminalise seeking an abortion. This is a long-overdue and a vital step towards ensuring that abortion is treated as what it truly is: healthcare. 

But, what next?

We work with schools across the country, and we know how important this change is for people seeking abortion care, but also for the way we talk about reproductive rights, especially with young people.

Illustration by Deeanna

Language matters

Throughout the recent coverage of the political debate, we saw some worrying trends in the language used. Words like “babies” used to describe foetuses, and discussions were often framed in emotionally coercive rather than medical or evidence-based terms.

This isn’t just semantics, language shapes perception.

When public conversations use inaccurate, misleading or stigmatising language, it makes it harder for people to understand and access care, as well as  understand their rights. It contributes to a climate of fear, shame, and misinformation.

That’s why comprehensive, inclusive, and evidence-led relationships and sex education is essential now more than ever.

Empowering education

We believe all young people deserve access to RSE that:

  • Uses accurate, age-appropriate, and inclusive language

  • Is led by experts

  • Equips them with the knowledge to make informed decisions

  • Addresses abortion as a healthcare issue, not a moral debate

What we’re doing next

In light of this legal change, we’re creating a toolkit to ensure the language and content reflect the current law, ready for the new academic year.

We’re also working closely with schools and educators to support them in delivering this updated information, because legal change is only the first step. It has to be matched by accessible, inclusive education.

If you’re a teacher or school interested in our toolkit, or want to know more about how we support RSE delivery, please get in touch via info@schoolofsexed.org.

Why aren't we talking more about consent?

Content warning: this post discusses sexual violence and misogyny. 

The rise of the #MeToo movement in 2017 highlighted to the media and some parts of society that sexual harassment and assault are far too common

Eights years on and education professionals still consistently underestimate the prevalence of sexual harassment in schools and the young age at which it starts. 

The 2021 Ofsted report found that the frequency of harmful sexual behaviours meant some children and young people consider them to be ‘normal’.

People globally are protesting and speaking up about harmful behaviours, but this isn’t enough if young people aren’t a part of the conversation. Here’s some examples of prominent movements in the last decade:

The 2016 Brock Turner Case: The Stanford University sexual assault case, where Brock Turner was given a light sentence for assaulting an unconscious woman. This sparked international outrage and widespread discussions about rape culture, privilege, and the criminal justice system's treatment of survivors.

The 2018 Women’s March: Following Donald Trump's election, millions of people, primarily women, participated in the Women's March to protest against sexual assault, gender inequality, and various policies impacting women, drawing attention to abuse and the need for systemic change.

The 2018 "Times Up" Movement: In the wake of the Weinstein scandal, the "Times Up" initiative was launched by women in the entertainment industry to combat systemic sexual harassment in the workplace, with a focus on providing legal support for women who experience abuse or harassment.

The 2021 Sarah Everard Case: The kidnapping and murder of Sarah Everard by a serving Metropolitan Police officer sparked national outrage in the UK. The incident led to renewed scrutiny of police conduct and violence against women, prompting protests and calls for systemic reform in how authorities address women's safety.

The 2021 Sabina Nessa Case: The murder of primary school teacher Sabina Nessa in a London park received widespread attention for highlighting the racial disparities in media coverage of violence against women. Her death became part of a broader conversation about public safety, intersectionality, and the need for inclusive activism within the Me Too movement.

The 2024 Gisele Pelicot Case: Gisele Pelicot’s decision to speak publicly after discovering years of abuse at the hands of her husband and dozens of others became a turning point in France. Her bravery challenged ageist assumptions about sexual violence, ignited public protests and fuelled national calls to reform consent laws, to better protect victims. 

Illustration by Evie

At the heart of this change is the need for open, honest conversations about consent—starting with young people.

By teaching young people what consent truly means, we can challenge harmful norms to prevent future harm.

Conversations about consent

Recent years have highlighted how deeply embedded issues of entitlement, coercion, and shame are in societal structures, underscoring the urgent need for prevention rather than just response. Despite the #MeToo movement further highlighting the need for real prevention, discussions around consent in schools are still often focused narrowly on legal definitions and reactive measures. 

Our facilitators are in schools everyday, teaching about consent and talking to young people. Issy says, “most young people have now heard the word consent in school, they have probably seen the video comparing consenting to tea to consenting to sex and can recite 'unconscious people don't want tea'. But the reality is that consent is not as simple as tea. Peer pressure, objectification, a culture of slut-shaming all make it so much more complex! Young people need nuanced, ongoing conversations about consent and healthy relationships.”

Why is consent education essential?

Preventing harm

We have been proud partners in world-leading research to understand youth experiences of image-based sexual harassment and abuse, with recommendations put forward for education providers and government.

One research project, Understanding and Combatting Youth Experiences of Image-Based Sexual Harassment and Abuse (Ringrose, et al. 2021, found that image-based sexual harassment overwhelmingly impacts girls, is heavily influenced by gender norms, and an intersectional approach to contextualised harm is needed.

The research found that boys were rewarded for sharing girls’ images amongst their peers, as an indication of their masculinity status, however girls were shamed and victim-blamed for having their image shared without their consent.

Findings in this project support other research, confirming the extent, scale and impact of sexual harassment, for example, 59% of girls and young women aged 13-21 said they had faced some form of sexual harassment at school or college in the last year.

Research shows that schools delivering specialist relationship and sex education lessons can significantly reduce violence in partner relationships.

Challenging cultural norms

Many of the issues highlighted by #MeToo - such as victim-blaming, entitlement, microaggressions and shame - are reinforced by cultural attitudes that can make harmful behaviours seem acceptable. Consent education helps dismantle these norms by:

  • Teaching young people that it is everybody’s responsibility to create consent.

  • Addressing power dynamics, such as those between peers, gender, teachers and students, bosses and employees, or older and younger individuals.

  • Emphasising that mutual respect and pleasure, not persistence or pressure, is the foundation of consent.

Empowering young people to seek support

Many survivors of harassment or assault have shared that they didn’t know how to respond when their boundaries were not respected or felt pressured. 

Consent education gives young people the tools to respect other people’s boundaries and seek support if they ever experience any harm. 

Educators and caregivers have the ability to empower young people through being supportive, non-judgemental and believing (rather than blaming) them. 

Redefining consent as a positive concept

Consent isn’t just about avoiding harm, it’s about pleasure, mutual respect and communication. Educators can frame consent as a way of building trust, encouraging openness, and deepening connections, whether in friendships, workplaces, family dynamics, or romantic / sexual relationships.

Normalising consent and communication is crucial. Often, portrayal of sexual encounters in movies rarely shows any communication at all. This can lead to young people genuinely thinking it is strange or awkward to talk about sex with a partner or to build any kind of consent. 

Addressing “grey” areas and myths

Misunderstandings about consent contribute to harmful behaviours. Consent education should address common myths, such as:

  • “If they didn’t say no, it’s okay.” Consent must be explicit, enthusiastic, continual, and freely given.

  • “It’s blurred lines if someone changes their mind.” Consent can be withdrawn at any time, and respecting that is essential to create a space where someone feels able to change their mind.

  • “This only applies to certain situations.” Consent is crucial in all interactions (including online), from sharing personal space to intimacy.

  • “Did they say no?” many young people do not recognise that if someone doesn’t resist or fight back then it’s still sexual violence (EVAW 2024).

Centring inclusivity

Consent education must be inclusive of all identities and relationships. This means including scenarios that represent LGBTQIA+ experiences and disabled people. It also means recognising how intersectionality can shape people’s experiences of victim-blaming, belief, consent and coercion.

Addressing pushback

While many have welcomed the focus on consent and accountability sparked by #MeToo, we still see a lot of pushback in our work. Some people argue that focusing on consent risks overcomplicating sex and relationships, or fostering fear.

In response, it’s important to emphasise that consent education is not about creating barriers - it’s about better communication, safer and more mutually pleasurable experiences. By teaching young people to navigate sex with empathy and respect, we can empower them to create positive, meaningful interactions.

The long-term impact

By making consent education a priority, we’re not just addressing immediate safeguarding concerns—we’re laying the groundwork for long-term cultural change.

  • Safer Communities: When people understand and respect boundaries, rates of harassment and assault decrease.

  • Healthier Relationships: Clear communication and mutual respect lead to stronger, more fulfilling connections.

  • Empowered young people: when young people understand consent and their rights they are more likely to seek support when they need it.

Our role

School of Sexuality Education is dedicated to delivering inclusive relationships and sex education workshops. Our curriculum provides young people with the knowledge and skills they need to navigate relationships, advocate for themselves and each other, and challenge harmful norms.

If you’re an educator or caregiver, we’re here to support you in making consent education a priority in your community..